On Publishing, Part 3: Vanity Publishing

 On we go, fellow castaways on the literary sea.

This week, let's explore Vanity Publishing.

As much as I want to throw up in my mouth every time this subject comes up, it's a thing, because these vanity publishing scam jobs are still raking in money hand over fist from beginning authors.

So first of all, let's clarify a definition here: A "Vanity Press" is a company that makes its money from authors, not from books sales. Here is how it works:

You receive an email or a letter saying, "Yes, we love your story! Let's put it in print!" Okay, maybe not in that exact phrasing, but you get the gist here. All they want, they say, is three to five thousand dollars to cover editing services and a cover, and they PROMISE they'll get it onto Barnes & Nobel's shelf! Now, who in their right mind would turn that down, I ask? Why, no one, of course!

And that's how I very nearly got took. Because I didn't know how the business of writing is supposed to work. So let me lay it out for you, and it's right here where The Golden Rule comes into play. The Golden Rule of Publishing is this: The Gold flows FROM the Publisher, TO the Author. I'm convinced to this day that that is the case.

Here's what actually happens: They deliver almost ZERO actual editing. Maybe a cursory proofread. Nothing else. They Give it an amateurish cover, because who can really tell? You're too damn tickled and proud to finally become A PUBLISHED AUTHOR to realize that although your baby is cute, it needs a good, thorough chewing and a back-and-forth between you and your editing team. But what do I know, right? Then they set the price point at some ridiculous altitude, and let it languish in the sales basement of Amazon. Because they don't care how many you sell. They've probably promised you 100% of the profit, and told you you can keep your copyright.

But look at the contract you've signed: A seven-year, exclusive contract for all publishing formats, and if you're not happy, all you need to do is buy the contract out for another five hundred dollars.

They don't care how crappy your manuscript is. They have a 100% acceptance rate. Every book gets the same treatment. You make ZERO sales, and they don't care. They move on to the next sucker.

PublishAmerica is one of those companies. Whitmore Publishing. Dorrance. There are way too many to keep up with, and even so, some companies have even told me, "We have no room for your manuscript, but one of our publishing partners has agreed to look at it." Oh, boy. Don't hold your breath. This just gives the illusion of selectiveness while continuing to draw you along with that bait of "becoming a published author."

Do yourself a favor: look up a book called "Atlanta Nights." It was written by a group of top-selling, professional authors to expose PublishAmerica for the scam job it is. They deliberately wrote the most horrid, train-wreck punctuated, nuclear disaster they could come up with. Each author was assigned thee different chapters (not even sequential, but maybe I'm wrong), and they weren't allowed to communicate with each other. Guess what? It was accepted. And "published." Then the authors blew the cover off the joke.

One young man I worked with at my day job, came to me and asked my opinion on the novel he had published through PA. So I bought a copy. At twenty-five dollars. And it was horrid. A prologue so long it should have been a chapter in itself and revealed way too much of the plot later. Made me not even want to bother with the rest. But I fought on. Lord, I fought on. Sentence fragments, poor grammar, numerous spelling errors, lengthy expository passages, all stacked up. I couldn't finish.

Doo yourself another favor: Check out the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America's webpage, Writer Beware!

https://www.sfwa.org/other-resources/for-authors__trashed/writer-beware/

Here, I just gave you your first contact in the professional writing community. That's where I started to wake up and realize that not all was sunshine and roses in the publishing community, and there were actually people who only wanted to take my money and run.

So, I'm getting a bit long-winded here, I know, but I want you to know you have options, and you need to take yourself seriously enough (and believe in yourself enough) to not pay these fly-by-night operators any of your heard-earned cash, because they are going to allow trash to be put on the market in your name, and a reputation is ten times harder to restore than to establish. There are no shortcuts to a smooth, quality product that people will want to read again and again.

As usual, leave your comments here if you want to discuss any of these concepts, and if I am helpful at all to you, let me know.

Let's do this!

On Publishing, Part 2

 So last week we talked in brief about contract publishing, aka "Traditional Publishing." This week, let's talk about the different methods of self-publishing. And here is where the debates begin, because there are some practices out there that I hesitate to call "publishing" in the strictest sense.

The first thing to remember when self-publishing is this:

You're NOT going to do it alone. There are many good reasons for this.

When I first wrote my book, I thought I was going to keep my little baby under a sheet and spring it upon an unsuspecting world, and everyone would read it and cry and say over and over again, "Where has this been all my life?" and it would be an overnight best-seller, and I would have a comfortable income stream.

Yeah, right. That was before I learned about critique partners and beta readers. In addition, I nearly got took for a ride by a few shysters out there posing as publishers. We'll get to those guys on another post.

Self-publishing is a huge challenge, and I say that based on my own experience. The first thing I had to lay down was my pride. The second thing was my sensitivity, because cupcake, this business is not for the squeamish or the hesitant. By that I mean I had to develop a thick skin, because my story was certainly not "All that and a bag of chips." I was just too close to the work to see it. I actually got offended because I couldn't understand why anyone would want to turn me down. I didn't see the whole list of issues that needed fixing, and when people did bring those issues up, I wrote them off because I thought they were all wrong.

Now, after those 40-plus rejections, I actually did get picked up by a small press out of Montreal, which was an amazing journey in itself. But this post is about self-publishing, right? So let's stay on track, Cy. That press went out of business after some time due to health issues of the editor-in-chief and CEO. She's still an amazing person. I got all my publishing rights returned, and proceeded to self-publish all my books all over again.

Now, in self-publishing, YOU are the publisher. You are responsible for editing, cover art, promotion, setting up all your own book events, etc. Everything is your own responsibility.

You think to yourself, "Fine; I'll just do my own editing and cover art."

Sorry, kiddo. That's not how it works.

Like I said, you are too close to your own baby to be able to make impartial but necessary changes to it. Take it from me, you need an editor who is not invested in the work. A second set of eyes who will be blunt and demanding. You're not here to make friends; you need someone who is as dedicated as you are to making this work a product worth being on the market, who will point out all the needless repetitions, grammatical errors, misspellings, and incorrect punctuation that you missed. What you do NOT need is someone who will dictate changes that alter the vision of the work, or who will become a dictator. It's YOUR story. Any changes you make will be in YOUR voice, or not at all. I can recommend a couple of really good editors if you're at a loss. Other ways to make contacts in the industry include membership at critique sites like critique Circle.

Good editing is not cheap. Cheap doesn't give your book the spit and polish it needs in order to be the best work you can put out. But good editing is always worth the investment. Always.

Cover art is your next expense, and unless you have a degree in graphic design, please do NOT do your own cover art. I know. Expensive. Expect to pay two hundred dollars and up for a professionally designed cover. Believe me, there are elements we civilians simply do not know need to be included in catching a potential reader's eye.

As to platform, I use Draft2Digital. I also have a KDP account. Yes, I give these platforms a certain share of my cut. This is because I want to have an easy way for readers to access my books, both in eBook and print versions.

The plus of self-publishing is pretty obvious: You get to keep a larger percentage of your earnings. The minuses are also pretty obvious. YOU are the show. You are responsible for overseeing and coordinating everything to do with putting out a quality product.

If there are any things you want to bring up for discussion, let me know. We'll get them into the cycle and have some vigorous conversation.

On Publishing, Part 1: Traditional

 Well, I suppose this is a long time coming. To be honest, I had to figure out what exactly this blog was really about. Now, I believe I have it nailed down.

In other social media platforms, I see so many new authors struggling to avoid the pitfalls and traps that have sprung up seemingly overnight in the publishing industry. So my new aim is to make this blog a forum for those who wish to publish, for those who are already published, and for publishers to come together to improve the industry and clean out the scammers.

It's easy to be overwhelmed by all the things I want to say, to the point my brain becomes clogged, and nothing comes out. But I didn't get five novels on the market by letting "brain clog" stop me. So I'm going to break this series down into bite-sized pieces, and we can chew the fat on each one. And if we need to dwell on one point or another, we can have more involved conversations about it.

Five, you say. Only five? Sure, five. That hardly makes me a subject matter expert in so many points of view. But let me ask you: How many books have you published? Not trying to be rude. But let's get real here. The guy who's been there only has to get there a few times to be identifiable to someone who hasn't been, but wants to be. And let's face it: Stephen King is a little too busy to be mentoring newer authors.

First things first: What I share here is my own opinion. You know what opinions are like. Here's a clue: Everyone has one, and they all stink. Seriously, though, my opinions are posted here based on real data that I have accumulated over the years. Remember, what worked for me may not work for you. My aim is also to remain correctable.

The bottom line is that I can give new authors, new tools in their toolboxes, and they can smell a scam when it comes across their feed. So let's dive in.

The first question, of course, is this: What method of publishing do I pursue? There are pros and cons on each method, some are pretty questionable at best, and others are outright scams.

The two most respected methods are Self-Publishing and Traditional Publishing. We'll look at each type, and discuss what might be right for you.

TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING 

I also call this Contract Publishing. It used to be the only way you got your book in print, unless you had deep, deep pockets. You submit your manuscript to the acquisition editor's staff, and hope to catch their attention.

What happens is this: Your manuscript goes to the bottom of a stack called "The Slush Pile." The slush reader (usually an apprentice or college undergrad) would read the first three or four pages (more if you're exceptionally good), and decide if it goes to the actual acquisitions editor. Bear in mind, most publishing companies receive hundreds, if not thousands, of manuscripts per month. In short, they are looking for a reason, any reason at all, to reject your MS. In which case, you'll get an email or letter stating, "After careful consideration, we have decided that this manuscript is not for us. We wish you luck in your future endeavors."

It's important that you note two things: First, it is critical that you do not take these rejections personally. It's nothing against you, and it doesn't mean your story sucked. It just means that your baby has not found a home yet. Look through your MS again, see if it needs some surgery, fix it if necessary, and try again. I got rejected over forty times before my first novel was accepted for publication. The key is DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES GIVE UP. Take a short breather if you have to, but never quit.

The publishing industry is highly competitive, and there are a thousand other writers out there as good or better than you are. If you want that contract, you're going to have to work for it. The fact is, less than 2% of beginning authors are accepted and signed to a contract.

The second thing to remember is this: You must follow their submissions guidelines TO THE LETTER. No fancy stationery, no "special" fonts or lettering styles, no brightly colored fonts. The guidelines are there to see if you can follow instructions.

Scott Edelstein wrote a book some years ago that saved me a whole lot of heartache. It's called Manuscript Submission. I gave my copy away some time ago, but I'm going to buy another copy and keep it this time. Do yourself a favor and read it. It's no scam job, I promise.

Pros of Traditional Publishing:

1. No out of pocket costs by the author. Let me repeat that louder: NO OUT OF POCKET COSTS BY THE AUTHOR. The publishing house will assign you an editing staff and a cover artist. You will work with the staff assigned to you to polish and present your little beauty and get her ready for Market.
2. Possible advance payment. Depending on the house and the terms of your contract, you may receive an advance payment. This is an amount based on how much your publisher believes they can sell in a certain time. This can be somewhere in the thousands of dollars.
3. Book store space. Stores like Barnes and Noble sell their shelf space, and the larger publishers pay big money to occupy space to the detriment of smaller publishers.

Cons of Traditional Publishing

1. You have little to no control over your cover. The house will give you a cover and say, "This is it." Remember, though, these are professionals who have a vested interest in giving you a bright, shiny baby that the public will love.
2. No active promotion. Most publishers already throw their advertising budget at authors they know will sell big. The established authors are the ones who get the billboards, radio ads, and book tours. As for you, you are on your own. Some publishers might give you a mention here or there, but you are responsible for your own marketing.
3. That advance we were talking about earlier? That may be all you get. The house will pay little to nothing more until you "sell out" that advance. And chances of that are pretty slim for most new authors.

HARD REALITIES

90% of authors on the New York Times Best-Seller list still have to work day jobs just to make ends meet. To make Stephen King/JK Rowling money, you have to hit the right nerve at the right time, and even a brilliant story may or may not be the one that sells big. My first novel won the EPIC Award for Best thriller the year it was released. This was voted by editors and publishers. In my mind, that gives it a little more credibility than a reader's poll, which can turn into a popularity contest based on who can activate the most friends and family rather than the quality of the story itself. Not that reader's polls are to be ignored. But award-winning stories don't always equate to sales.

Today we looked at some things to consider about Traditional, or contract, publishing. In subsequent posts we'll look at other options that are available. We'll also look at ways to polish your baby to a squeaky sheen and get it actually ready for the public.

We'll look at self-publishing next, and then the process of prepping for publication. If there are any subjects you want to talk about, let me know. We'll put it on the docket.

Stay tuned, and if you have anything you want to add, we do allow comments. Keep it civil, folks.

FREEDOM!

"Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose."

That's what Janis said, anyway. Right?

In all the political uproar over the last couple of decades, the one thing I don't hear about is how we actually define "Freedom." What does it mean to be free? What does it have to do with Liberty?

I have my own definition for Freedom. And it's very close to the one for Liberty. Freedom is having the choice to do the right thing for you. Abortion advocates cry aloud the mantra "right to choose!" at every opportunity, only on top of the right to choose some even say it's their right to make someone else pay for their choice. But I digress. Let's stay on topic, Cy.

The last year and a half has been very illustrative of what I really mean by "right to choose." Across the country, and even across the globe, people were bombarded with mandates and bans, all meant "for our own good." Mask wearing. Social distancing. Closing business after business, grinding whole economies to screeching halts. All in the name of "what's best for you."

Removal of choice.

Mandates and bans are the opposite of Freedom. The opposite of Liberty. Because they represent the removal of choice. Comply. Do "A" or face consequences. Do NOT do "B" or face consequences. And everyone who asked why was shamed, ostracized, canceled, smothered and silenced by the Mob.

Only one problem. That's not what our country is. Mandates and bans are for tyrants and dictators. The United States is a nation of free citizens. FREE citizens. Not subjects. Our constitution, the foundation that defines us, has as its primary focus, security of the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It's right there. Read it.

What that means is that we should be free to make our own choices about masks and social distancing. And just because I don't sign onto your flavor of the month on mask policy, doesn't mean I want to come up to you and cough in your face. It also doesn't mean that mask policies in and of themselves are bad. It just means we have the right under our constitution, our basic law, to be part of the solution and not just compliant sheep. we are free citizens, and able to make our own decisions about our health, thank you very much.

Freedom is a big thing in this country. a BIG thing. People died to give us the freedom to choose. Not just a couple, or a hundred, or even a thousand. Hundreds of thousands of people fought with their very lives to make sure we had a place where a person could choose how they wanted to provide for themselves, where they could decide on their own which God they wanted to worship, or even IF they wanted to worship.

Now we have people in office who want to tax us on how many miles we drive in our cars. We have mandates. We have bans. We have tyranny.

It's not about what's the right thing to do. It's about giving us the facts so we can decide for ourselves what the right thing to do is. Because what's right for you isn't necessarily right for me, and vice versa. It's about forcing compliance, one for all. Seat belts are a fantastic idea. But not everyone wants to wear seat belts. Face masks are a great idea. But not everyone can wear them. Everyone is allowed to have an opinion. But just because it's your opinion, doesn't mean it has to be a law for everyone else.

Freedom is the sacred right to choose, each free citizen, whatever choice is right for them in their own heart.

Don't throw it away.

The Repairman

I want to address an issue this post that has hit very close to my heart. It touches myself, several of my friends, and some family as well.

This is about mental illness.

It hits us in a variety of guises, from depression to paranoia, to PTSD, to DID, to full-blown schizophrenia.

The reason that I write this today, is inspired by a particular incident relating to a close friend of mine. They were actually told by a family member that if they were a stronger person, they would not be suffering the situation that was diagnosed. In this case, it was a combination of PTSD and Dissociative Identity Disorder.

Read this again: "This only happened because you aren't a strong enough person to handle it." IT, being the multiple traumas that spawned my friend's illnesses.

So this is to my friend, but also to anyone who suffers in their mind:

It isn't your fault. And you ARE strong enough, or you wouldn't be here today. We'll use this illustration. Look at this  picture:

The wires are frayed, pinched. Contacts are worn, malformed. The bundle is loose. The mounting tray for the equipment is broken.

Is it the wire's fault that someone came along and cut the ties that bound the bundle together? Is it the contacts' fault that oxides built up, that wires were pinched and chafed? The materials used for the installation were all MIL-spec. For those who are not aviation buffs, it means the materials used were all top-notch.

You ARE strong enough. What you are made of, is good. Life happened, and everyone has their limits. And for someone else to second-guess how strong you are, only shows their own lack of understanding about what happened.

The fact is, you need help putting things back together, repairing the damaged spots.

The final product isn't perfect, but it isn't about reinventing the wheel. The whole system doesn't need to be removed and rewired, to make it functional. Replace the broken tray. Clip out the damaged portions of wire. Extend wires with splices where they are needed. Attach a new wire bundle mount and re-route the side bundle. Clip off the damaged connector contacts and use the right tools to put new contacts in place.

Use the right tools. Use the therapist. Receive the prayer. Let the Master Healer restore and heal the broken places.

Using outside help doesn't mean you're weak. It means you're smart enough to ask for help.

Give yourself a break. And be your own awesome self. Just get better.

NADIA Picture Tour: Next stop, Las Vegas!

Marco was crouching on the concrete outside the loading dock when Jenna approached the
rear of the Sands Hotel five minutes later. He was engaged in an impromptu dice game, and
judging from the pile of bills in front of him, he was doing well today. He looked up when she
called his name, and a distrustful scowl replaced the grin he’d worn a moment previously.
He stood and sauntered to Jenna. She found herself looking at him eye-to-stomach. She
stood her ground and looked up, meeting his gaze evenly, and held out the card-key. He took it
from her and stuck it in his back pocket. “You could use a bath. You smell like a dumpster.”
Without waiting for a reply, he turned on his heel and strutted toward the loading dock’s door.

“T-Bear, you watch my money, ‘ight?” he said to one of his compatriots, a skinny kid with a
shaved head.

Jenna followed him inside, through the service area, and up twelve flights of stairs. After
they exited the stairwell, he led the way down the hall, finally stopping in front of a door on the
left side. He opened the door with the card-key and held it for her. As she walked past, he said,
“Pick up and dial 8787. Order whatever you need. Tab’s taken care of.” He left, taking the cardkey
with him.

When she saw herself in a mirror, she was appalled. Need a bath? Marco, you were being a
positive gentleman. Her hair looked like an explosion in a wig factory. Her clothes hung in
rumpled, filthy rags on her small frame, and her face sported a couple of bruises from the day
before.

She picked up the bedside phone and ordered two changes of clothing and a steak dinner.
She tried to call Anna at the hospital, but learned that she hadn’t been seen or heard from since
the ‘bomb scare’ the day before last. There was no answer on Anna’s cell, either. This can’t be
good. She couldn’t call upline, not from here. But she hoped they’d have some answers for her
when she did call them.

Lunch came while she soaked in the tub. She finished her bath, toweled off, and ate. That
was when she noticed how tired she was. The bed was soft, the covers warm, and in less than a
minute, Jenna was in the arms of Morpheus.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Got a confession to make: I was not actually in Vegas. My kids were there, for a convention of one of their favorite TV shows. It was pretty cool to hear about. They got to meet the stars, and came back with some awesome souvenirs and even more awesome memories.

I called my son after they landed and checked into the Rio. I specifically had this scene in mind when I asked him to take shots. He did a fantastic job, as will be seen in further installments.

This is actually the loading dock of the Rio, as you can see in the shot. Granted, this is a short, short scene. And maybe it comes across as inconsequential in the grand scheme of the NADIA Project. But strangely enough, this is one of my favorite moments from Unalive. Maybe because the entire sequence leading up to this, and the scenes immediately afterward, were pivotal moments in Jenna's story.

Stay tuned for more updates from Las Vegas!

Are You Reading That AGAIN???

It amazes me that so many people look at a book I'm reading (The one with the tattered pages, the cover half worn off, the spine hanging together by sheer willpower and the few driblets of glue that oozed between the pages at the bookbinder's) and say words to the effect of, "Man, are you reading that one again? You read it once already."

Well, of course I've read it already. I know what happens  I know each and every character like they are my family. I know their foibles, their strengths, I know every cliffhanger and every twist of the story. And yes, I remember how it ends.

So why read it again and again?

Let me ask this: Do you have a favorite song, a favorite album? I wore the grooves right off the first live album by Rush ("All the World's a Stage," in case you're wondering). Because I enjoyed the way each song was assembled, how the notes and chords rang in my ears, how the words made me think about the message in the song (See kids, back then, songs actually had a message).

What about movies? I know people who gladly sat through many consecutive showings of the latest slasher flick or the new sci-fi epic. I assume it's all about how they feel when the hero triumphs, or the way the villain jumps out from behind the couch with that big fantastic butcher knife.

That's the way I feel when I read a book. Even though I've pored over it a dozen times before, I still get those same feelings again when Mycroft falls silent. When Jon kisses Nadia. When Black Beauty comes back home.

So why are books different than music? Different than movies? If you can watch the same DVD over and over, you can read the same book over and over. And while you're at it, buy a few more. Dozen, that is.

Just read. Again.

Reading: Who needs it?

Why read Books? Why read any damn thing?

Why in the world, when I can just get all my information from FakeBook, movies, TV and every blog/website that agrees with my worldview? I mean, I don't need anything more, right? So why do I need to actually take the time, sit down, and open those moldy old pages just to read dated work from dead guys who don't know anything about today or how things REALLY work?

*Rolls up sleeves* Allow me to elucidate.

1.) Multiple studies show that people who read are less likely to suffer from Alzheimer's and dementia. Want proof? Do a Google search of "Reading and dementia." Reading is exercise for your brain. Work it, it becomes stronger.

B.) You might actually get smarter. Robert A. Heinlein was America's Father of Science Fiction. He was also an astronomer and mathematician. In nearly every book he wrote, there's something to learn. Example, in Have Spacesuit, Will Travel, we get a cool lesson about the solar system from the inside out plus some nuggets about the relative orbits of the Nine (yes, nine) discovered planets.

Now, The Big One (Wait a minute, we covered Number One above. Okay. Let's just call it The Last Point):

Point of view. The movie can't put you inside the mind of any one of the characters like a book can. You see what the character is doing, but you don't know the motive. You don't see how their brains work. You can't understand why. And understanding can take work. And understanding can open you up to different viewpoints than your own.

I just saw a Kimmel feature where he sent a guy out into the street to ask people at random if they could even name a book. Of course, he cherry-picked the answers to fit his point as well as entertain his audience. I'm sure the number of respondents who could not only name a book, but have actually read one in the last year were more than he wants to make out. At least I hope so.

Social Media wants to highlight how stupid people can be. Look at the memes spreading like wildfire that get shoved up our noses like cayenne pepper juice. They portray each person's enemy of choice as unintelligent, an idiot, a fool. Not just national figures, but everyday kids and young people. Now granted, some folks can be pretty ignorant, like the folks who "love the smell of person X's colon" rather than their cologne. Or the congressman who thinks Guam is going to overturn. Or anyone who says that rape is okay. Hoho, let's laugh at the fool. Grrr, let's be outraged at the idiot. Jerk that knee, let's see you dance.

It takes a cool head to stop and think. It takes focus to see through the bull muffins to the full story, the one that the OP or the press fail to double-check or balance. It's why we get sucked into the propaganda the gets sprayed at us.

Not every reader balances or double-checks. I get it. But I think that being a reader increases one's chance of catching words and phrases that are intended to trap or influence us into thinking a certain way, of signing onto something that is patently false. Does that still leave room for disagreement? Of course. We all have opinions, and we don't all have to agree with each other.

But reading at least makes us more informed. Isn't it worth the extra effort?

Revisiting The Pinnacle, Part 2

Greetings, fellow castaways on the Third Rock Out.

This week, I want to look at the first prong of the Pinnacle's attack: The political focus.

To recap quickly, The Pinnacle operates in three areas to achieve their goal of world domination: the political, the economic, and the social.

Politically, the first step is to insert their moles into the leadership structures of every major power on the planet. These moles are recruited from societies like Skull and Bones, the Masons, and top fraternities and sororities in campuses across the world. There is a specific focus on a single chapter of a single group, but the bottom line is that all they need are a few professors who proselytize from the lectern in subjects like Gender Studies, Political Science, and Philosophy. These are the best classes by which to probe deepest into young minds, to twist their thinking into a mindset of a global worldview (Remember the "It takes a village to raise a child" speech?).

The aim at this point is to convince these future leaders that there IS NO GREAT NATION, no great culture, no great system that includes any kind of individuality. One does this by minimizing any accomplishments of any nation or political structure that espouses personal liberty. Because the way to exercise power is to make all the sheep docile and servile. No troublemakers who think any individual can rise to greatness (Remember the "you didn't build that" speech?)

Additionally, the mindset must be instilled that borders and nations are a passe idea. The current crisis of illegal aliens is a prime example. Notice the resistance to a national language of the United States? The rephrasing of "Undocumented immigrants" vs "Illegal aliens," in spite of the fact that many people are in this country against our laws? It's a conditioning that will eventually lead to the erasure of national borders, the push to a globalist society.

Jimmy DeBartolo's problem is not that a bunch of ex-hippies are gathering once a month to sing "Imagine" at an altar to John Lennon. His problem is that the ones pushing the globalist movement are not being honest and up front about their aims and motives. They are hiding behind lies and smokescreens, dictating policy  that keeps countries economically dependent on each other for essential commodities like fuel and food, that negates enforcement of national borders, that forces subservience to the World Court and the UN over local or national laws.

The press plays into this as well, by propagandizing events to force more and more power upwards, into the hands of the federal government. They play up stories that criminalize local police forces and appeal to the "Higher virtue" of federal agencies like the FBI and the US Marshals. This makes it easier to throw deadly force into trouble spots, because the police and officials have no vested interest in the localities they will be sent to suppress.

More and more programs at the federal level gives those few moles the power of the purse as well, with the threat of pulling funding for programs like Welfare and School funding, if those local agencies and schools don't toe the line and teach/operate the way the feds want them to. Force more people to toe the line, use a willing press to back up your aims and provide support for your plans without giving away your end game, you can control an entire country without the citizens even being aware that you are dragging them kicking and screaming into a world of your own design.

Indeed, The Pinnacle have moles as high as the office of the Vice President, Congress, and the Senate in the United States.

And yes, though my fictional bad guys are named The Pinnacle, it seems as though there is a Globalist Movement that even now is seeking to remove individual liberties and force us all into the same, mediocre mold of sameness. There are no illegal aliens in anyone's borders, because we are now all World Citizens, expected to toe the line and sign on to this new paradigm of a unified, docile, "civilized" world. And anyone who doesn't sign on is "unenlightened," "racists," "ignorant."

Next week, we'll look at the Social attack.

Revisiting The Pinnacle: Part One

This is a revised repost of the original published some years ago, but being as we're seeing so many of the changes outlined in the original, I felt it appropriate to revisit the theme, with some added details and clarifications.

Feel free to comment. My rules as always apply: You may disagree all you want, but keep it civil and respectful in my house.

So what would it look like if the Pinnacle were real? How would they operate?

First, for beginners, The Pinnacle is the name I gave the antagonists in my novel series, The NADIA Project. Their aim is simple, although clichéd: World domination. How they differ from the Bond villains or Dr. Evil and his screaming hordes is this: The Pinnacle could do it, and no one would ever know. Their goal is not to rule openly, but as the power behind the throne. Thus, the true leadership stays invisible. On the surface, all looks as though nothing has changed. Their motto, after all, is Praestat facere rex ac esse rex. “It is better to make a king than to be a king.”

Think of it this way: In the United States as in other countries, we have elections, and if we don’t like a certain official, we vote them out of office. It’s that simple. Other nations have dictatorships or monarchies of some nature. Rebellion, coup or assassination is usually what changes leadership in these areas. At any rate, it’s common for a country’s leader to lose his position, if not his life at the hands of a dissatisfied populace.

But what if a group could remain anonymous, behind the scenes as it were, and load elections with their own candidates? They could do this, and we would never know. So either way, the shadow group is guaranteed their real goal, which is power. We’ll discuss this more in-depth in later installments. But the point is, it can be done. What if it already is being done? Would we know the warning signs?

One would have to understand the plan would take years and perhaps decades to fulfill. The founders would realize that they may never live to see the final realization of their dream. But how many movements today have the same far-sighted vision? Certainly, many activist groups have been in operation for decades, and are just beginning to see their visions come to pass. Some of them have pure motives, whether we agree with their methods or not. Take Greenpeace, PETA, or other socially-focused groups. Others have less than altruistic aims: The Communist Party, al Qaeda, or Hamas come to mind. Their goals are plain, brutal, and simple. Take power, and kill anyone who gets in their way.

The point here is that the process takes a long time to execute, whether it's a social, economic, or political goal. It takes patience. The patience of a python.

Look at the whole constrictor order of snakes. They can dangle from a tree limb in wait, for days if need be, for their prey to wander within striking range. Then they drop onto their target and wrap it in coils of steel-hard, stubborn muscle. They take their time. Wrapping their coils about the victim is only the first step. They don’t simply crush the life from their prey by brute force. No, they wait until the victim exhales, and then with each breath they tighten, ever so slightly. This prevents the victim from being able to inhale. Slowly, they suffocate, and the snake has all the time it needs to consume its meal.

The Pinnacle has been working behind the scenes, hiding in the brush, waiting for the moment to strike. It has been inserting converts into the areas of business, entertainment, news media, shipping, technology, and the oil industry. Once they have leadership of these industries, the strangulation begins.

Other teams will infiltrate social movements and political parties. Thus, the attack will be a three-pronged assault aimed at dulling the public’s senses to what’s really happening: Economic, social, and political.

We’ll discuss these areas beginning next week. Feel free to comment as we go along.